The Australian Government has introduced sweeping new laws aimed at combatting hate, antisemitism and extremism. While the reforms are framed as national security and community-protection measures, they also carry important consequences for migrants, visa applicants, and temporary residents in Australia.

These changes significantly expand the Government’s powers in areas that directly intersect with visa eligibility, character assessments, and visa cancellation decisions.

Why These Changes Matter for Migration

Under Australian migration law, non-citizens do not have an automatic right to remain in Australia. Visas can be refused or cancelled if the Minister (or a delegate) determines that a person:
• Fails the character test;
• Poses a risk to the Australian community; or
• Is not of good character or is contrary to the public interest.

The new hate and extremism laws broaden the conduct that may trigger these assessments — even where no criminal conviction exists.

Expanded Visa Cancellation and Refusal Powers

One of the most significant changes for migrants is the Government’s strengthened ability to refuse or cancel visas where a person is found to be:
• Promoting or supporting extremist ideology;
• Engaging in hateful or vilifying conduct;
• Associated with a prohibited hate group; or
• Considered a risk to community cohesion or safety.

Importantly, formal criminal charges are not always required. Online activity, public statements, group affiliations, or conduct overseas may be taken into account.

This has implications for:
• Student visa holders
• Temporary Skill Shortage (subclass 482) visa holders
• Partner visa applicants
• Permanent visa applicants
• Visitor visa holders

Impact on the Character Test (s 501 of the Migration Act)

Australia’s character provisions already give the Minister wide discretion. The new laws
strengthen the Government’s position when arguing that a person:
• Is not of good character;
• Has engaged in conduct that indicates a risk of harm; or
• Does not meet the expectations of the Australian community.

This means that conduct which may not previously have resulted in visa action could now be
relied upon to justify:
• Visa refusal
• Visa cancellation
• Refusal of citizenship
• Mandatory detention pending removal

Prohibited Hate Groups and Association Risks

The new framework allows for certain organisations to be formally declared prohibited hate groups.

For migrants, this is particularly important because association alone — not just active participation — may be sufficient to raise concerns under migration law.

Examples include:
• Membership (past or present)
• Financial support
• Online promotion or endorsement
• Attendance at meetings or events
Even historical associations may be scrutinised during visa processing or review.

Online Conduct and Social Media Scrutiny

Migration decision-makers already consider social media and online behaviour in some
cases. These reforms increase the likelihood that:

• Past posts, comments or shared content;
• Participation in online forums or channels;
• Public statements made overseas
could be relied upon as evidence of unacceptable conduct.

This is particularly relevant for applicants applying for permanent residence or citizenship, where long-term character assessment is critical.

What This Means for Visa Applicants and Holders

If you are a non-citizen in Australia, these reforms mean:
• Higher scrutiny of behaviour, both online and offline
• Increased importance of clean character records
• Greater risk of visa refusal or cancellation for conduct deemed extreme, hateful or divisive
• Reduced tolerance for behaviour inconsistent with Australian values

Sponsors and employers should also be aware that the conduct of sponsored visa holders can have serious compliance consequences.

Practical Steps for Migrants

To reduce risk:
• Avoid association with extremist or hate-based organisations
• Be cautious with public statements and social media activity
• Seek advice if you receive a Notice of Intention to Consider Cancellation (NOICC)
• Obtain professional guidance before lodging complex visa or citizenship applications
Early legal advice can be critical, particularly where character concerns may arise.

Final Thoughts
Australia’s strengthened hate and extremism laws represent a clear shift toward lower tolerance and stronger enforcement, particularly for non-citizens. While the laws are designed to protect community safety, they also expand the Government’s discretion in migration decision-making.

For migrants, visa holders and sponsors, understanding how these reforms interact with migration law, character provisions and public interest powers is now more important than ever.

Found this helpful? Feel free to read our other blog posts!

Want step-by-step guidance? Check out our DIY Partner Visa Package here.

If you found this post helpful and want to support us, consider buying us a coffee!